Each round of a negotiation starts with someone working out where the deal stands. This page counts what that costs a team like yours and what comes back when the record is kept. Every number is yours to change, and each default says where it came from.
Your team
Pick the preset nearest you, then change anything. The defaults describe a US team of six that already runs a CLM and an AI reviewer.
optional
Leave blank to see value only. Enter a figure to see payback.
The assumptions behind the arithmetic
Your agreements
One row per kind of paper. The share spent re-establishing state is the part of each round that goes on reading the last version, comparing drafts, finding who approved what and briefing the people who were not in the room.
| Agreement | New a month | Rounds | Days a round | Counsel hours a round | Share spent re-establishing state | People in the deal | Share landing in the quarter's last month | Contract value | Value at risk from one missed position | Deals where a settled position is re-opened |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer MSA | ||||||||||
| DPA and security schedule | ||||||||||
| Order forms and renewals |
How much memory changes
Re-establishing where a deal stands is a cost you can count.
Today's figure in bold. The figure with memory, under the base case, beside it.
Hours
- Negotiations a year
- 624
- Hours spent re-establishing where deals stand
- 1,864 h then 1,118 h
- Counsel hours on negotiation, all activities
- 5,616 h then 4,870 h
- Cost of the re-establishing hours
- $414k then $249k
- Full-time counsel consumed by them
- 1 counsel then 0.6 counsel
Capacity
- Hours the team has for contracts
- 4,320 h
- Hours short
- 1,296 h then 550 h
- Negotiations the team cannot reach
- 144 then 71
- Outside counsel spend on the overflow
- $233k then $99k
- Delay per deal from re-establishing state
- 5.9 days then 3.7 days
- Deals pushed past quarter end, a year
- 60 then 37
- Revenue deferred into the next quarter
- $1.1m then $689k
People
- Counsel leaving, a year
- 0.8
- Hours to rebuild one leaver's deal context
- 19 h then 5.4 h
- Hours lost to departures, a year
- 15 h then 4.2 h
- Hours lost while a new counsel ramps
- 180 h then 144 h
- Cost of departures and ramp
- $34k then $26k
Exposure
- Settled positions re-opened or missed, a year
- 38 then 23
- Expected loss from them
- $365k then $219k
Time that sales, procurement and finance spend re-establishing the same state is not counted here.
What comes back
2.6 h a week, per counsel
83 more negotiations a year on the same team
2.2 days off each deal's elapsed time
Counted once
$402k a year, base case
- Outside counsel spend replaced$134k
- Remaining saved hours at loaded cost$116k
- Ramp hours avoided$6.2k
- Expected loss avoided$146k
Saved hours are valued once: the part that comes off the outside counsel overflow at the outside rate, the rest at loaded cost.
Hours a replacement spends rebuilding a leaver's context are already inside the re-establishing hours and are not added again.
Re-opened positions enter as expected loss, probability times value at risk, never as gross exposure.
Revenue pushed past quarter end is deferred, not lost, and stays out of the total.
Sources
Every default on this page, grouped by how well it is sourced. Assumptions are listed last with the reasoning behind each.
Two or more independent sources agree
- Hours a year 1,800 hours(range 1,600 to 1,850)
COST-PER-LAWYER HOUR: Total spend on internal lawyers divided by (lawyers x 1,800 hours)
ACC with Major, Lindsey & Africa, 2025 Law Department Management Benchmarking Report, 2025, Global, 71% US. Source The divisor ACC uses for cost per hour. - Departments with rising matter volume 0.81 share of departments(range 0.79 to 0.81)
81% report increasing matter volumes
Thomson Reuters, 2025 Legal Department Operations Index, 2025, US (128 responses, US corporations). Source The demand side of the backlog. Corroborated by Thomson Reuters Institute, 2025 State of the Corporate Law Department: 79% of corporate law departments saw legal matter volumes increase over the past year. - Departments with flat headcount 0.65 share of departments(range 0.63 to 0.65)
Nearly two-thirds of corporate law departments reported flat or decreasing attorney headcounts.
Thomson Reuters Institute, 2025 State of the Corporate Law Department, 2025, Global (2,400+ GCs). Source The capacity side of the backlog. Corroborated by ACC 2026 Chief Legal Officers Survey: 63 percent of CLOs expected to sustain their teams' headcounts. - Contract value erosion 0.086 share of contract value lost(range 0.03 to 0.2)
"average value erosion now estimated at 8.6%"; "Top performers: erosion rates slightly over 3%"; "Worst performers: erosion exceeding 20%"; "comprehensive dataset encompassing more than 1,200 organizations"
World Commerce & Contracting with Deloitte, The ROI of Contracting Excellence, 2023, Global, 1,200+ organizations. Source The yardstick our expected-loss assumption stays under.
One credible source
- Department size 6 counsel(range 5 to 12)
The median number of lawyers remained relatively stable at four from 2021 to 2023, before increasing to seven in 2024 and then settling at five this year.
ACC with Major, Lindsey & Africa, 2025 Law Department Management Benchmarking Report, 2025, Global, 71% US. Source A six-counsel team sits between the overall median department and the median for a $1B to $5B company. - Loaded cost per counsel 400,000 USD a year(range 350,000 to 501,000)
Table "COMPENSATION BREAKDOWN FOR SENIOR COUNSEL AT PRIVATE COMPANIES", row "$1B-$5B": Salary "186 207 229 275"; Bonus "31 45 93 125"; LTI "29 36 81 88"; Total "246 288 402 488"
BarkerGilmore, 2025 In-House Counsel Compensation Report, 2025, US. Source Blended total pay for a six-lawyer team led by a GC is about $350K; cash alone is $312K to $324K. Benefits add about 40% on cash. We take $400K and leave department overhead out, because overhead is not saved when hours are saved. Cash pay corroborated by Major, Lindsey & Africa (2026) placements; benefits share from BLS ECEC (2026), 30.0% of compensation; CLOC (2025) median internal expenditure per in-house lawyer $501K. - Outside counsel rate 600 USD an hour(range 400 to 1,000)
First year where median partner rate in largest firms exceeds $1,000 (2024); "some partners charging over $2,300 per hour"
LexisNexis CounselLink, 2025 Trends Report, via Corporate Counsel Business Journal, 2025, US. Source Commercial contracts work mixes partner and associate time at firms below the largest tier. CounselLink 2026 Trends Report: largest firms' median partner rates 40% higher than the next tier; partner rates up 5.1% in both 2024 and 2025. - Stakeholders per deal 5 people(range 3 to 13)
the average B2B buying decision involves six to 10 people, each of whom is armed with more than four pieces of information they've independently gathered
Gartner, as cited by Shopify, Demandbase and others, 2024, Global (Gartner clients, US-heavy). Source Counsel, sales or procurement, finance, security, the counterparty's equivalents. Forrester (2024): 13 people within an organization are involved in the buying decision. IACCM (2017): five internal functions touch a basic contract. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked. - CLM adoption 0.59 share of departments
Contract management software: 59%
ACC Law Department Management Benchmarking Report, via Legal.io, 2024, Global, 32 countries (421 departments). Source The baseline team runs a CLM. - Knowledge unique to a leaver 0.42 share of an employee's knowledge unique to them
42 percent of employee knowledge is unique, meaning if an employee left the company, the rest of the workforce would be unable to do 42 percent of their job
Panopto with YouGov, Workplace Knowledge and Productivity Report, 2018, US. Source Why a leaver's deal context has to be rebuilt. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked. - Search time share 0.2 share of the working week(range 0.13 to 0.3)
the average knowledge worker spends 8.2 hours each week looking for, recreating, and duplicating information and expertise
APQC, 2022, Not stated (APQC membership skews US). Source The general knowledge-work figure that the contracting share rests on. McKinsey Global Institute (2012): 19% of the working week searching and gathering information. - MSA cycle time 40 days(range 21 to 126)
the median benchmark for this measure is 40 days
APQC, 2026, Global (APQC Open Standards Benchmarking, 3,081 companies). Source Four rounds of ten days. Corroborated by Vendr (2023), 41 days for a new deal. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked.
Indirect or inferred
- Share of time on contracts 0.4 share of counsel time(range 0.2 to 0.6)
Contracts-related tasks represent at least half of the daily work of more than four in ten (43 percent) corporate counsel
ALM / Bloomberg Law survey, 2022, US. Source No survey publishes the share directly. 30% fits a general department; a team with a deal backlog sits higher, so we take 40%. EY (2019): more than a quarter of in-house hours go to routine compliance and low-value tasks. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked. - In-house attrition 0.13 share leaving a year(range 0.1 to 0.2)
31% of the 67 general counsels who left Fortune 500 roles in 2025 had served less than three years
Russell Reynolds Associates, via ABA Journal, 2026, US (Fortune 500). Source No measured annual rate for in-house lawyers exists; 13% is inferred from GC turnover and job-search intent. Axiom (2022): 14% of in-house counsel are searching for new jobs. NALP Foundation (2024): 20% associate attrition as a proxy. - Ramp time 6 months(range 5 to 12)
professionals require 20 weeks, while managers require 25 weeks and executives require 26 weeks
Mellon Financial, Learning Curve Research Study, via PlanSponsor, 2003, US. Source Six months to full speed on the team's paper; twelve to add value beyond it. Legal.io practitioners (2023): a minimum of 6 months to feel like I'm not drowning and a year plus to really find my feet. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked. - Contracts per lawyer 180 contracts a lawyer-year(range 100 to 300)
Legal: 5 hours ($500)
IACCM (now WorldCC), Tim Cummins, via LawGeex, 2017, US (inferred). Source No published figure. Inferred from IACCM's five legal hours per basic contract and half of an 1,800-hour year on contracts: 1,800 x 50% / 5. The presets land at 104 (SaaS) and 143 (procurement) contracts per counsel; the procurement volumes were raised from 15 / 20 / 40 to 20 / 25 / 50 a month so the eight-counsel team shows a capacity gap, and stay inside the range. - Days a round 10 days a round(range 4 to 21)
the median benchmark for this measure is 40 days
APQC, 2026, Global (APQC Open Standards Benchmarking, 3,081 companies). Source Forty days over four rounds for an MSA; three weeks a round on a PPA. Vallor (2026, vendor): median 11.3 days for an NDA and 18.7 days for an MSA before the first redline. Quote via secondary coverage; primary page blocked. - Counsel hours a round 6 counsel hours a round(range 2.5 to 22)
Legal: 5 hours ($500)
IACCM (now WorldCC), Tim Cummins, via LawGeex, 2017, Global, 700+ organisations (IACCM membership, US-heavy). Source Six hours a round for an MSA all activities in; 1 to 1.5 for routine paper; 16 to 20 for project agreements. Vallor (2026, vendor): median 9.2 hours per MSA review, p90 22. - Re-establishing share of a round 0.35 share of a round(range 0.19 to 0.65)
Knowledge workers spend up to 28% of their working week reading and answering email, another 19% searching and gathering information and 14% of their time communicating and collaborating internally
McKinsey Global Institute, The social economy, 2012, Global (MGI estimate, US-weighted). Source The independent figures for knowledge work generally sit at 20 to 30%; the one contracting-specific split is vendor data at 65%. We take 35% for an MSA on a team with a CLM and an AI reviewer, 25 to 30% for routine paper. APQC (2022): 8.2 hours a week looking for, recreating and duplicating information. Vallor (2026, vendor): 38% context gathering, 27% routing and chasing, 14% obligation logging. - Quarter-end share 0.45 share of a quarter's deals in its last month(range 0.33 to 0.6)
"2.90x increase in number of deals closed at the end of the month but an 11.43x increase in number of deals lost"; sample "9.8 million sales opportunities from 151 companies" across "nine quarters"
InsideSales Labs / XANT, published in Harvard Business Review, 2017, US-centric (151 companies). Source No issuer publishes a percentage. A 25 / 30 / 45 shape across the quarter's months is inferred from the month-end spike; a third for project agreements with no quarter-end pull. Appian FY2025 10-K: a significant portion of agreements with customers during the last month, and often the last two weeks, of each quarter. - SaaS contract value 100,000 USD a contract
New purchases 2025: "$6K" (down from $11K in 2024); "15,817 real transactions"
Vendr (Vertice company), SaaS Trends Report, 2025, Global, US-weighted buyer base. Source An enterprise MSA at the top of the published range; order forms and renewals at the renewal median. Vendr (2025) renewal median $24K. OpenView Partners, via Saber: enterprise ACV $50K to $100K. - Realised AI savings 0.1 share of contracting effort removed(range 0.05 to 0.35)
"One-third report AI saves less than 30 minutes daily"; "22% report 30 minutes to one hour in daily savings"
Bloomberg Law, State of Practice survey, 2025, US. Source Why the baseline still carries most of the re-establishing work after AI review. ACC and Everlaw (2025): nearly 60% of in-house counsel report no noticeable savings yet. DocuSign with Deloitte (2026, vendor): 37% time savings is the ceiling.
Assumptions, with the reasoning
- Overflow share to outside counsel 0.3 share of the capacity gap(range 0.1 to 0.5) No survey measures what share of unreachable work goes to firms. 46% of departments send half or more of all work outside and 43% of CLOs planned more outsourcing in 2025, but most of that is specialist work rather than overflow. We assume 30% of the hours the team cannot reach go to outside counsel; the rest is absorbed as late nights and delay.
- Tooling factor 1 multiplier on the re-establishing share(range 1 to 1.3) The defaults describe a team that already runs a CLM and an AI reviewer. Independent surveys put realised AI savings at under 30 minutes a day for most in-house lawyers, about 10% of contracting effort, and CLM adoption moved WorldCC's measured value erosion from 9.2% to 8.6% over nine years. A team with neither tool re-establishes state by hand, so we scale its share up by 30%; a team with a CLM alone by 15%.
- Redline rounds 3 rounds a negotiation(range 1 to 10) No independent source counts rounds. Practitioner and vendor material (Harvey, 2025) puts NDAs at 1 to 2 rounds, MSAs at 3 to 4 and bespoke paper at 8 to 10; the presets use 1.5 for NDAs, 2 for order forms, 3 to 4 for MSAs and 6 to 8 for project agreements.
- Value at risk 0.5 share of a year's contract value(range 0.1 to 1) A liability cap has been the most negotiated term since 2007 and the usual position is twelve months of fees with carve-outs. One missed position, a cap conceded in round one and re-opened in round three, or a carve-out lost, puts about half a year's fees at risk on a SaaS deal. On project agreements the figure follows delay and performance damages caps of 10 to 15% of contract price, taken at a fraction because most mismatches are caught before close.
- Re-open rate 0.1 share of negotiations(range 0.03 to 0.1) No survey counts re-opened positions. EY found 71% of departments do not monitor deviations from standard terms and 78% do not systematically track obligations. We assume one negotiation in ten sees a settled position re-opened or missed on complex paper, one in twenty-five on routine paper.
- Stakeholder sensitivity 0.05 added share per extra person(range 0 to 0.1) Each person beyond four in a deal adds briefing and approval-chasing. We add 5% to the re-establishing share per extra person; the one contracting activity split available puts routing and chasing at about a quarter of review time, which this term scales.
- Probability of slipping past quarter end 0.2 probability(range 0.1 to 0.3) Month-end closes run at 2.9 times a typical period and losses at eleven times. We assume one in five last-month deals that carry re-establishing delay slip past quarter end; one in ten for project agreements, which have no quarter-end pull.
- Share recognised at signature 0.5 share of contract value(range 0 to 1) SaaS vendors bill a year up front and the booking lands in the quarter signed, so we count half the contract value as committed at signature. For power projects revenue begins at commercial operation, so 2%. Nothing on buy-side paper.
- Rebuild multiplier 4 multiple of a participant's per-round re-establishing hours(range 2 to 6) A participant re-establishes one round's changes. A replacement reads every round so far, half the rounds on average, and reads slower because 42% of a leaver's knowledge is unique to them. Four times a participant's per-round hours.
- Ramp productivity 0.5 average productivity during ramp(range 0.3 to 0.7) A new counsel works at half speed on average across the ramp: near zero in the first weeks, near full by the end. Twenty weeks to productivity for professionals and the practitioner rule of six months to stop drowning bracket the ramp.
- Probability of loss given re-open 0.2 probability(range 0.1 to 0.4) Most re-opened positions are caught or re-won. We assume one in five becomes a realised loss. At 10% re-opened and 20% realised, expected loss is 2% of value at risk per deal, well under the 8.6% average value erosion WorldCC measures.
- Weeks a year 48 weeks(range 46 to 50) Forty-eight working weeks after leave and holidays, the usual convention for turning annual hours into a weekly figure.
- Reduction in re-establishing hours 0.5 reduction in re-establishing hours(range 0.3 to 0.7) Reading back the last version, comparing drafts and logging what changed go when the record is kept; chasing approvals and briefing people only partly. The one contracting activity split available puts context gathering at 38%, routing at 27% and logging at 14% of review time, so about half of the whole is removable. Conservative 30%, aggressive 70%.
- Reduction in elapsed time 0.35 reduction in reconstruction's share of elapsed time(range 0.2 to 0.5) Elapsed time falls less than effort because part of each round is waiting on the other side and on approvals. We take 35% in the base case.
- Reduction in context lost per departure 0.6 reduction in context lost per departure(range 0.4 to 0.8) 42% of a leaver's knowledge is unique to them. A kept record of each negotiation turns most of that into something a replacement reads rather than reconstructs; 60% in the base case.
- Reduction in ramp time 0.25 reduction in ramp time(range 0.15 to 0.4) A new counsel ramps on the team's past negotiations as well as the live ones. The record shortens the ramp by a quarter in the base case: six months to stop drowning becomes four and a half.
- Reduction in re-opened positions 0.5 reduction in re-opened or missed positions(range 0.3 to 0.7) Settled points stay settled when the issues list is kept across rounds. We take half of re-opened or missed positions away in the base case, since some are re-opened by the other side on purpose.
- Coverage 0.8 share of negotiations through the system(range 0.6 to 1) Not every negotiation runs through the system in the first year. 80% coverage in the base case, 60% conservative, everything in the aggressive case.
Tell us about your contracting workflow.
Request access