Dear Tessa
Three deviations.
First, the interest margin. Sanction letter paragraph 4 sanctions a spread of 2.85 percent over the reference rate. The facility agreement at clause 9.1 defines the margin by reference to Schedule 3, which sets a base of 2.60 percent plus a utilisation fee of 0.50 percent, a total of 3.10 percent. The deviation is visible only by arithmetic. I classify it as a drafting error, since the schedule appears to have been carried over from another facility. Second, the security. Paragraph 7 of the sanction letter requires the personal guarantee of the promoter as a condition precedent; clause 4.1 of the facility agreement lists the hypothecation deed but not the guarantee, and the guarantee itself is unsigned. Drafting error. Third, the tenor. Paragraph 3 sanctions 60 months; clause 7.2 provides 72. I classify this as an intended loosening, since the repayment schedule at Schedule 5 has been recalculated to 72 months, which is not an accident.
Each is corrected as a tracked change in the facility agreement with the sanction letter quoted in the margin. The deviation list sets out all three with both texts.
Leela